Sonia Gandhi:if she is deserves it??

VERY INTERESTING HISTORY!





At the very beginning of his book, 'The Nehru Dynasty',

Astrologer K.N. Rao mentions the names of Jawaharlal's father and grandfather.





Jawaharlal's father was believed to be Motilal and Motilal's

father was one Gangadhar Nehru.



We all know that Jawaharlal's only daughter was Indira

Priyadarshini Nehru; Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland

of tuberculosis. She was totally against Indira's proposed marriage

with Feroze. Why? No one tells us that!



Now, who is this Feroze? We are told by many that

he was the son of the family grocer. The grocer supplied wines, etc..

to Anand Bhavan (previously known as Ishrat Manzil)



What was the family grocer's name?



One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather was

Pandit Nehru. But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers,

the paternal and the maternal grandfathers.



In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the

more important grandfather in most societies.



Why is it then, nowhere, we find Rajiv Gandhi's paternal

grandfather' s name? It appears that the reason is simply. Rajiv

Gandhi's paternal grandfather was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh

area of Gujarat .



This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, had married

a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam.



This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being

a Parsi was derived. Rajiv's father Feroze, was Feroze Khan before he married

Indira, against Kamala Nehru's wishes.



Feroze's mother's family name was Ghandy, often associated

with Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi, sometime before his wedding

with Indira, by an affidavit.







The fact of the matter is that (and this fact can be found

in many writings) Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan

University by Guru Dev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanour, the lonely

girl was all by herself, while father Jawaharlal was busy with politics,

pretty women and illicit sex, the mother was in hospital.



Feroze Khan, the grocer's son was then in England and

he was quite sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she changed her religion,

became a Muslim woman and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque.



Nehru was not happy, Kamala was dead already or dying.

The news of this marriage eventually reached Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

(better known as Mahatma Gandhi) .



Gandhi urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him

to ask the young man to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing

to do with change of religion, from Islam to Hinduism for instance.

It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze

Khan became Feroze Gandhi.



The surprising thing is that the apostle of truth, the

old man soon to be declared India 's Mahatma and the 'Father of the Nation'

didn't mention this game of his in the famous book, 'My Experiments with

Truth'. Why?



When they returned to India , a mock 'Vedic marriage' was

instituted for public consumption.



On this subject, writes M.O. Mathai (a long-time Private

Secretary of Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI! ) 'Reminiscences

of the Nehru Age' on page 94, second paragraph: ' For some inexplicable

reason, Nehru allowed the marriage to be performed according to Vedic rites

in 1942. An inter-religious and inter-caste marriage under Vedic

rites at that time was not valid in law. To be legal, it had to be a civil

marriage .'



It's a known fact that after Rajiv's birth Indira and

Feroze lived separately, but they were not divorced. Feroze used

to harass Nehru frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru's political

activities. Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into

the Prime Minister's residence Trimurthi Bhavan.



Mathai writes that the death of Feroze came as a relief

to Nehru and Indira. The death of Feroze in 1960 before he could consolidate

his own political forces, is itself a mystery. Feroze had even planned

to remarry.



Those who try to keep tabs on our leaders in spite of

all the suppressions and deliberate misinformation, are aware of the fact

that the second son of Indira (or Mrs .Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi

was not the son of Feroze. He was the son of another Muslim gentleman,

Mohammad Yunus.



Here in passing, we might mention that the second son

was originally named Sanjiv. It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother's

name. It was changed to Sanjay when he was arrested by the British

police in England and his passport impounded, for having stolen a car.





Krishna Menon was then India 's High Commissioner in London .

He offered to issue another passport to the felon who changed his name

to Sanjay. Incidentally, Sanjay's marriage with the Sikh

girl Menaka (now they call her Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name

of mythological Lord Indra's Court dancer rather offensive !!) took place

quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus's house in New Delhi



The marriage with Menaka who was a model (She had model

for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a towel) was not so ordinary either.

Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed young women pregnant. Menaka

too was rendered pregnant by Sanjay.



It was then that her father, Colonel Anand, threatened

Sanjay with dire consequences if he did not marry her daughter and that

did the trick.



Sanjay married Menaka. It was widely reported in Delhi

at the time that Mohammad Yunus was unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with

Menaka. Apparently he had wanted to get him married with a Muslim

girl of his choice. It was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most

when Sanjay died in the plane accident.



In Yunus's book, 'Persons, Passions & Politics' one

discovers that baby Sanjay had been circumcised following Islamic custom,

although the reason stated was phimosis. It was always believed

that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi and due to this she used to

turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to run the country as though

it were his personal freedom.. Was he black mailing her with

the secret of who his real father was? When the news of Sanjay's

death reached Indira Gandhi, the first thing she wanted to know was about

the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with him.



Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards.

At least one case is very graphically described by M.O. Mathai in his 'Reminiscences

of the Nehru Age', page 206.



Mathai writes:



'In the autumn of 1948 a young woman from Benares arrived

in New Delhi as a sanyasini named Shraddha Mata (an assumed and not a real

name). She was a Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures

and mythology. People, including MPs, thronged to her to hear her

discourses. One day S.D. Upadhyaya, Nehru's old employee, brought a letter

in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM's house.

As she departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that she was young,

shapely and beautiful. Meetings of Nehru with her became rather frequent,

mostly after he finished his work at night. During one of Nehru's

visits to Lucknow , Shraddha Mata turned up there and Upadhyaya brought

a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply and she visited Nehru

at midnight...' Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared.





In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent

looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said that a young

woman from northern India arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave

birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars

about herself. She left the convent as soon as she was well

enough to move out but left the child behind.



She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle

in which, among other things, several letters in Hindi were found. The

Mother Superior, who was a foreigner, had the letters examined and was

told they were from the Prime Minister.



The person who brought the letters surrendered them...'I

(Mathai) made discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to

get a clue about his whereabouts. Convents in such matters are extremely

tight-lipped and secretive.



Had I succeeded in locating the boy, I would have adopted

him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant

of who his father was.'



Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi, we all know now that he changed

his so called Parsi religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino

of Turin , Italy . Rajiv became Roberto. His daughter's

name is Bianca and son's name is Raul. Quite cleverly the same

names are presented to the people of India as Priyanka and Rahul.



What is amazing is the extent of our people's ignorance

in such matters. The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London

after taking over as Prime minister of India was very informative. In this

press conference, Rajiv boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Parsi.

Mind you, speaking of the Parsi religion, he had no Parsi ancestor at all.

His grandmother (father's mother) had turned Muslim after having abandoned

the Parsi religion to marry Nawab Khan.







It is the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation

on behalf of Rajiv. From the New York Times to the Los Angeles Times and

the Washington Post, the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven. The children's

encyclopaedias recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical Engineer

from the revered University of Cambridge . No doubt US kids are among the

most misinformed in the world today! The reality is that in

all three years of his tenure at that University Rajiv had not passed

a single exam. He had therefore to leave Cambridge without a certificate.





Sonia too had the same benevolent treatment. She was stated

to be a student in Cambridge . Such a description is calculated to mislead

Indians. She was a student in Cambridge all right, but not of the University

of Cambridge , but of one of those fly by night language schools where foreign

students come to learn English. Sonia was working as an 'au pair' girl

in Cambridge and trying to learn English at the same time. And surprise

of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per Vedic rites in full view of

India's public.



This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now

a foreigner leads a prestigious national party because of just one qualification

being married into the Nehru family. Maneka Gandhi, though Indian,

herself is being accepted by the non-Congress parties not because she was

a former model or an animal lover, but for her links to the Nehru family.



Saying that an Italian (or any foreigner) should not lead

India will amount to narrow mindedness, but if Sania Maino (now Sonia) had

served India like, say, Mother Teresa or Annie Besant, i.e. in any way

on her own rights, then all Indians should be proud of her just as how

proud we are of Mother Teresa. OR



Saying that any other party which comes to rule

India is better is again equally worse.



The point is Indians who nominate the people to stand

in these elections; and the people who vote their rulers (i.e. the authorities)

must know that truth eventually come out some day. Don't

allow the famous land of India (our motherland) to be looked down

by others.